In response to:

Lessons in Green Chemistry

Jay Wye Wrote: Feb 07, 2013 6:18 PM
"progressives" are using the Green movement to further their communism,and to weaken the US for it's eventual downfall.
AZYaateeh Wrote: Feb 07, 2013 7:08 PM
Hence why it's known as the Watermelon Movement—green on the outside, red on the inside.

And seriously, know how many current European Greens used to have posts in Warsaw Pact governments?
HoovervilleFollies Wrote: Feb 08, 2013 10:17 AM
"Hence why it's known as the Watermelon Movement—green on the outside, red on the inside."

Only among idiots. Just for good measure, why don't you throw in the old chestnut about the first Earth Day occurring on Lenin's birthday? The blindness of conservatives about matters relating to the environment never ceases to amaze those of us who are not willfully ignorant about the promise of a sustainable future.
Reginald10 Wrote: Feb 09, 2013 6:14 PM
The only "sustainable" future is in the graveyard. Truly, the only constant in life is change, and the "sustainable movement" seeks to reduce or eliminate change; and the only refuge from change is stasis, which is Death.

“Green chemistry” has become the latest craze and now government agencies are sponsoring programs to teach it to kids in school. But what exactly is green chemistry? Some say it’s simply about making products safer, but it actually comes loaded with a political agenda that isn’t really about safety—it’s about control.

The ostensive goals of “green chemistry”—safer products—surely can be achieved without government, driven purely by market demand. In fact, industry performs its own version of green chemistry every time it develops new products because after all, businesses don’t succeed by poisoning their customers. They succeed by producing useful and safe...