In response to:

When I Want a Progressive’s Opinion on What Guns I Should Have/Hunt with, I’ll Give it to Them

jaxxie Wrote: Jan 20, 2013 8:52 AM
You're are a senile old fool, Seawolf. You're suggesting that to preserve the 2nd amendment, that the 1st amendment be violated. Yeah that's a great idea. "It is forbidden to even discuss the Constitution" Just like the Taliban -- where it's forbidden to question or doubt the Koran in any way. Moron.
MudontheTires Wrote: Jan 20, 2013 2:14 PM
And what do you say about your precious "hate speech" laws Jack @ss?

Seawolf specificly used the word "IMPEACH". That's NOT violating the 1st Amendment, you stupid prog.
My buddy, Green Beret badass Bryan Sikes, shot a massive whitetail buck last week during our South Texas Purple Heart Adventure. He whacked said muy grande with a LaRue Tactical OBR chambered for the glorious .308 Win. round. Oh and BTW, Sikes used a high capacity magazine during this hunt.

For those of you who aren’t hip to the LaRue, it is a weapon that progressive darlings say we should not have because we don’t “need” such a weapon for hunting.

Hunting, according to these wizards of odd, is what they think our founding fathers had in mind when...

Related Tags: Guns Hunting Hunting Rights