Previous 11 - 20 Next
In response to:

Ben Carson Owes No Apologies

jaxxie Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 10:11 AM
Get a life USMC -- you're a little obsessed with this one poster.
In response to:

Ben Carson Owes No Apologies

jaxxie Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 10:09 AM
The truth about this Carson thing is this: Most likely Obama didn't give it much thought. Carson came off as just another hanger-on seeking the spotlight and testing out the political waters. It's become clear that he's seeking to run for office and he's testing the reaction. As usual, the rightwingers are clinging to this -- they are in desperate need of diversity in the Repub. party and they're hoping that Carson is the "Next Big Thing" for them. Being rude, disrespectful and speaking inappropriately may have some appeal but I'm guessing that if Carson showed poor judgment in this venue with his boorish choice of words, that he's not a very good prospect for the Repubs going forward
In response to:

Ben Carson Owes No Apologies

jaxxie Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 10:00 AM
Good observation. More like a kid in class who's happy because the teacher slipped and fell, or made a mistake in math.
In response to:

Ben Carson Owes No Apologies

jaxxie Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 9:59 AM
Good observation. More like a kid in class who's happy because the teacher slipped and fell, or made a mistake in math.
In response to:

Ben Carson Owes No Apologies

jaxxie Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 9:56 AM
Don't be such a weenie, John. You obviously just read Schlichr's article where he thinks he's discovered some truth about elected officials. We all know that -- you guys are just figuring out NOW that the Pres. is not the King??? Ben Carson was trying out the political field for himself. He made a mistake in acting like a Royal Buttwipe and I'm sure he'll be reminded of his disrespectful "Look what a Jerk I can Be" attitude if he decides to move forward politically.
Looks like McCain has lost all dignity.
:--) Sorry Ken - that won't work. The fact remains. You're an idiot IF you fall for all this fearmongering. You remind me of children trying to scare themselves with ghost stories --- they really aren't scared because they know that they're not true. It's infantile to run around screeching about a President giving an annual SOTU Address and comparing it to a tyrant's behavior.
:--) Sorry Ken - that won't work. The fact remains. You're an idiot IF you fall for all this fearmongering. You remind me of children trying to scare themselves with ghost stories --- they really aren't scared because they know that they're not true. It's infantile to run around screeching about a President giving an annual SOTU Address and comparing it to a tyrant's behavior.
Who is this Schlicher? Talk about a Useful Idiot! What kind of Loser would ever think for one minute that people we elect are Lords and Masters over our lives and why would this jerk think that he needs to write a column explaining that the Pres. is not "Daddy"? Are we really supposed to think that the State of the Union address is unique to the Obama administration? It's a formulated event -- with everyone in their place, the Pres walks in, shakes everyone's hand and grins and jokes and applauds. Repubs are panicking about their downward trending. With people like this writing this kind of trash - assuming that they have to educate their followers, no wonder all the smart people are pulling away from the Repub. party.
In response to:

The NRA is Winning the Battle

jaxxie Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 6:14 PM
That's a laugh. What "goods"? do you think he has, Simpleton? Roberts has a lifetime job -- do you really think he'd listen for one single second to a threat? Good way of looking at things, Jerry. If you don't agree with the SC, then for sure they were 'bribed' by someone. Even Porn King Thomas won't agree to waste time on this...
In response to:

The NRA is Winning the Battle

jaxxie Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 5:25 PM
Are you talking about that Taitz woman? They won't waste their time with that nutcase -- they're not discussing his 'eligibility' they're decide if they're even going to discuss it at all. Here's a spoiler alert: They won't. The only "evidence" is concocted documents, easily detected forgeries to try and make Obama out to be a criminal -- nothing the SC will spend a moment's worth of time with.
Previous 11 - 20 Next
Wednesday, May 22 | 10:46 AM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 10:46 AM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 10:46 AM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 10:46 AM ET