Previous 11 - 20 Next
Newt, if you're intellectually honest, you will have to admit that just as single parenthood was once frowned upon and then not, and gay coupling was frowned upon, etc, etc. so can things change to include polygamy and incestual marriage; and even animal love. Why not? Are you such a prude that you can't even imagine it being the norm in our society? And why so averse to delve into the core of the issue, as to it's potential consequences on the cohesiveness of societies foundational institution, the family? Is that assertion of mine offensive to you? If you disagree that a solid family is not priority one for a society (including but not ideally between gay couples. The issue first, of course, is stability and care.) why?
P.S. Newt, you can't justify abolishing an ideology or tradition, because you can find fault in its foundation even, unless you can show how this fault id detrimental to society; which we all love. If it can be proven that it is reasonable or fair to insist on allowing all and any type of marriage (with declared love itself being the criteria) does that make it wise to enforce this change? Is it wise to ask the question?
Yet you can't answer (or defend against) the gist of his original post, can you?
Brilliant! I have not seen this put or said so concisely, anywhere. Thanks :)
Yet your sarcasm rings hollow, or doesn't work, because you're missing so many other, relating points and arguments and beliefs that contradict your presumptions about why they hold those beliefs. The only people who would take what you wrote seriously are those who don't know of what you speak. Anyway, it's true what Dennis says. Those on the Left are far more unaware of the the POV of their ideological opponents that we are of yours.
In response to:

Democrats Shaking in Their Boots

JapesMacFarLand Wrote: Aug 30, 2012 2:36 AM
I can't find the comment you're talking about??
If Aiken doesn't step down, and contributes to the Left winning the Presidential election coming up, then there will be far, far less beautiful success stories as you've shared. They will more likely have never been given the chance. That is the point.
Because the Left will continue to lynch him for his careless comments, he will lose his State, and could hurt the chances of getting the Left out of the White House. So you see, Carlos, she is not lynching him, rather saying that because the Left has lynched him, for the good of others he should step aside as the Senatorial candidate. Do you get it now? Or are you just a troll?
She's saying that he should step down *because* the leftist media will never let it go, and so greatly hurt his chances of being elected. (That's called critical thinking, and someone leftists aren't taught in their secular left controlled, State run schools, lol ;)
She's right, though. He should step down, because staying in could hurt many, many others presuming he'll lose the election and hurt the chances of ousting the Left from White House. Most know it isn't fair (as Ann wrote at the end of her article) yet that's how it is, and Akin should know this. He works for something bigger than himself. If I were him I'd accentuate that I meant no harm, but for the good of my country I should step down. Why won't he do this?
Did your restaurant ask you if your world view and values were akin to Leftism or Americanism? Did they ask you if submit to the bureaucratic collective, statist?
Previous 11 - 20 Next