In response to:

What's At Stake In This Week's Gay Marriage Cases

James____Tx Wrote: Mar 26, 2013 6:09 AM
Why the hell is government involved in this to start with. Mark my words there will be a price to pay for the new "rights" the gay community is demanding. Separate State and Marriage.
James____Tx Wrote: Mar 26, 2013 6:44 AM
When harm to another human being is the issue then the law should be applied in its fullest. This is considered a law of man or as I see it a Law of God. Having government involved in every little individual decision though is going to come back and haunt us all regardless if you considerate it moral or not.
_,l,, Vaporise this, Thought Police ,,l,_ Wrote: Mar 26, 2013 6:33 AM
"The government should not legistlate morality."

Positively not! I have enemies, and the b astards need to die! The government has no business telling me that that's murder and it's wrong. They should just butt out and mind their own business. /s

All laws "legislate morality." That's what law is. Laws say you must do this, but it's wrong to do that.
Marlette John Wrote: Mar 26, 2013 6:31 AM
The courts are NOT deciding what is moral. They are deciding what is LEGAL. We decide for ourselves what is moral. Pornography is LEGAL. Decide for yourself whether it is MORAL. The court may decide that gay marriage is LEGAL. Decide for yourself whether it is MORAL.
Simplecaveman Wrote: Mar 26, 2013 6:24 AM
But you're all in for the courts to decide what is moral and what is not for this issue.
Marlette John Wrote: Mar 26, 2013 6:21 AM
My point exactly. The government should not legistlate morality. Hence Gay marriage should be legal. Like you said, it's a contractual issue.
James____Tx Wrote: Mar 26, 2013 6:17 AM
Oh yeah we need Daddy/Mommy Government to legislate what is right and what is wrong. This should be an individual and contractual issue not a supreme court issue.

Lord the country is going to hell and this is what we are focusing on.
Simplecaveman Wrote: Mar 26, 2013 6:12 AM
Gays and liberals need legislation from the bench. They can't let the common public vote for laws. They did this with global warming (Some moronic Supreme Court Justice even cited An Inconvenient Truth in his opinion!). Now they're going to try and do it with gay marriage.
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments about the constitutionality of Proposition 8, the California ballot initiative that banned gay marriage in the state. On Wednesday, SCOTUS will hear arguments on the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act, the Clinton-era law that barred same-sex couples from receiving federal benefits even in the case of legal state marriages. The Court's opinions on these cases, which will come down in June at the latest, will be landmark decisions no matter the outcome.

The New York Times has a good infographic on the repercussions of potential opinions. The Prop 8...