1 - 10 Next
This was the first segment. Thanks for reading....
Third to last, or second, segment...
Second to last segment...
All posted in reverse order, of course.... This is the last segment. Read from the bottom up...
Abortion, Sexual Perversion, Communism -- it's all connected, and this has been known for over two centuries, at least. A common thread in all Communist Societies since the time of Plato was the concept of the "Community of Wives" All possessions were held in common, and this included homes, husbands, wives and children. Anything that a person today, in the Capitalist West, could consider "mine," would belong to "the community" in a Communist Society. Even Marx and Engels defended this arrangement, arguing from anthropological evidence that this was the condition of primitive man, and is therefore the naturally preferred state of humanity. Property is the centerpiece of Capitalism, and in the West **FAMILY is the basis of PROPERTY OWNERSHIP**. We have Christianity and Judaism to thank for this. The concept of "ownership" -- i.e., what's mine versus what's yours -- is written into the Ten Commandments, where not only is the FAMILY the context of PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, but it is clear that the **procreative nature of heterosexual MARRIAGE** is NECESSARY to the definition of FAMILY. The life accomplishments of a person and the accumulation of his possessions -- in other words, his entire LEGACY -- are HIS to BEQUEATH to his children upon his death. FAMILY, INHERITANCE and thus heterosexual MARRIAGE, are institutions that pre-exist anything we today would recognize as "the State," the legal and political structures of the West having grown up around these institutions. Anything that threatens the family -- abortion, promiscuity, no-fault divorce, gay marriage -- threatens the concept and transfer of property, threatens Capitalism, and threatens the Christian West.
1848 was the year in which the Communist Manifesto was published. Yet, Marx and Engels had only devised a recent version of communistic political, social and economic theory. They had many predecessors, like Plato, who advocated a communistic society in his Republic; the Jewish Essenes, who adopted an enforced communistic framework for life in their sect; Thomas Muenzer (1524), who as one of the leaders of the Peasant's Movement in Germany, advocated 'omnia simul communia' which he described as “All things shall be common, and occasionally they shall be distributed according to each one’s necessity...,” and whose ideas led to the Westphalian Revolt of Bockhold and Mattiesson (~1534) who, among other things, set up a **'Community of Wives'**; and more recently, in France, there were several pre-Marxian communistic societies -- for example, during the first French Revolution (1796) there was Babeuf's communistic society in which it was declared “The only rulers should be a board of distributors, whose duty it shall be to appoint each one to his labor and to distribute to the communities and individuals the provisions gathered into the public warehouses... a higher Being is to be recognized, but no Church, no priest, no marriage and no family,” and thirty years later, the French 'Egaliteurs', who declared that “they would make all things equal,” proclaimed atheism, and advocated not only the abrogation of personal property, but also of marriage and family life. In the same period, there was the communistic society of Count de Saint-Simon, who also set up a 'Community of Wives', proclaiming “The laboring class must be elevated to the highest position of human society, because they furnish the means by which man’s desires and wants are satisfied, while at present they unjustly occupy the lowest. The self-sacrificing love of all alone makes this possible. This doctrine is the new Christianity, which will introduce the kingdom of God into the world, inasmuch as it converts the religion of love into a religion of joy and pleasure.”Most significantly is the Communistic Society of the pre-Marxian philosopher, François Marie Charles Fourier (who died in 1837). His communist philosophy, and the society he built around it, epitomizes the the moral foundation of Communism. He wrote:
"Man's destiny is happiness. This he can attain only by harmoniously satisfying all his inclinations... Means are necessary to this end, wealth is accordingly the source of all happiness. Wealth is attained by means of labor. But in order that labor may produce happiness, an order of things must be introduced according to which all work together, and in such a manner that each one engages in the work in which he delights. In order that this may be accomplished, the individual must be persuaded to give his possessions into the hands of the society, for which he would then have a proportionate claim on the income of the whole; and these persons, thus united, will then also give up their separate homes, families, and training... They form clubs or 'phalanxes'... consisting of 1800 to 2000 persons, who are collected in a large house, the 'phalanstery', where everyone finds work according to his inclination." What we find here is a social and political order in which a Christian COULD NOT BE A PARTICIPANT – a society founded upon self-gratification as the primary ordering principle, with self-gratification as a fundamental Human Right to which each member of society is guaranteed equal access, at the cost of his neighbor: A. Happiness is attained only through gratification, B. Gratification requires wealth, C. The equal pursuit of gratification requires equal distribution of wealth, D. To equalize maximum access to gratifying experiences, possessions, because they are wealth, become the property of society, including: (1) a person's home, (2) a person's family, (3) a person's education E. Thus, (1) the institution of marriage is abolished, (2) family is abolished, (3) children become an asset of the state. F. Meanwhile, each individual is expected to entirely dissipate his share of public wealth on his own sensual gratification, in the 'satisfaction of all his inclinations'.
Marx and Engels, advocate for similar principles, not only in the Manifesto, but in other supporting works, like 'Fuerbach, The Roots of the Socialist Philosophy', 'Critique of Political Economy', and 'Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State'. Abortion, Sexual Perversion, Gay Marriage, Communism, ALL find their nexus in SELF-GRATIFICATION as the primary ordering principle of society, and the mandate of equally distributed self-gratification as a fundamental Human Right. Abortion is being called for as a Human Right, because of its connection to the woman's equal right to pursue sexual gratification without incurring the cost of children. [Likewise, gay marriage is being called for as a Human Right.] But it is only a step in the direction of Communism, which would ultimately have children and family turned over to the State, freeing both women and men to wantonly pursue sexual gratification, not at any appreciable cost to themselves, but at the cost of their neighbors, who all share equally in the ownership of society's children.
Back in February, I posted at length on this topic in another forum. The author of the above article seems to be picking up on the reality of what 'Gay Marraige' is intended to accomplish. It has nothing to do with granting 'Gays' the right to get married, but with destroying the institution altogether. NOT ONLY for the purpose of destroying family -- the fundamental economic unit of society (yes, family, not the individual) -- but of destroying PROPERTY RIGHTS! In the West, property rights have their foundation in legacy, or inheritance, which has always required something called the 'natural family' and the institution of marriage. Marraige, and its connection to property rights PREDATES all Western forms of government. The works of John Locke and the political philosphy that he posited were centered on legacy -- and since our American form of government is distinctly a 'Lockean,' this is also foundational to our political structures. But 'Gay Marraige' necessarily eliminates the legal recognition of the 'natural family' and replaces it with a legal fiction created by the State -- defined, regulated throughout and disposed of at the end of life by the State -- and thus also eliminating any appeal to the natural rights of the individual with regard to his posessions. The connections of 'Gay Marraige' to open Communism are mind-boggling. The comment I posted can be found here: http://www.wnd.com/2014/02/cpacs-gay-compromise-exposes-republican-rift/#comment-1255519262 I will try to post it below, but it is lengthy. If Townhall character limits interfere, you'll just have to read the original series of comments...
In response to:

More Trouble Than He Knows

JakeSchlangemann Wrote: Nov 10, 2013 10:39 AM
"The President needs to listen... needs to reach beyond... needs to... needs to..." The President NEEDS TO QUIT AND GO HOME! I know the objection: "But Biden, the drooling idiot, would inflict too much damage on America!" Obama has been elevated by the left as a quasi-deity. I'll grant them their fantasy, and insist that, accordingly, Obama is not making mistakes, he does everything on purpose according to a deliberate plan that is ruining our Nation and dispossessing us of our liberty. Therefore, I say, give me Biden any day of the week. I'd rather spend the next two decades fixing damage inflicted by the mistakes of a border-line retard, than spend the next two generations, or more, fixing damage inflicted by calculated sabotage.
1 - 10 Next