After liberals are done with the country, everything will be in rights list. Healthcare, Education, House, Car, Food, Job... you name it and it will be in the list. What is the problem then? The problem will be that who will make good those artificial rights? Libs don't think that far and those who do can't care.

When the Bush administration prosecuted terrorism like "war" and we had no incident of terror. It is not because they did not try but because waterboarding like techniques yielded the intel to intercept and foil the enemy plans. Obama administration on the other hand, is prosecuting terrorism like "crime" at the expense of valuable intel,,,,

... or how about 23 executive order banning IEDs from city limits? No this is serious. The nation lost its stomach to take the fight to them where they (the terrorists) were. Now we are forced to fight them here. The MSM mocked Mr. Bush when he said "We're taking the fight to the terrorists abroad, so we don't have to face them here at home."

Is this the ignorance of the Bible which is so fashionable among the elitists? Where did you see anti semitism in a book put together exclusively by Jews? Please read Romans 11 for a starter, if you care for facts.

Don't allow facts come in the way of statements. De-institutionalization started in 1955. Source: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/asylums/special/excerpt.html

I am amazed at simplistic views of liberals. Views like tighter gun control would have prevented Texas killings or that Obamacare will reduce cost and decrease the number of the uninsured while increasing coverages...

A more relevant connection which Chris Matthews will never make is between Obama presidency and the most feeblest and delayed recoveries from any of the recessions in the past. We are still recovering starting from June 2009. Only other parallel is that of a recession in the 1930 which was transformed to the great depression, thanks to FDR's government powered tweaks. I bet Chris Matthews can not bothered with facts.

Marriage is more than a covenant between one man and one woman. It has other precepts like one cannot marry someone who is already married to someone else. or that one cannot marry one's own sibling... Once one precept is allowed to fall, the other precepts will succumb too. I do not think the gay agenda is to add societal endorsement of marriage to gay relationships (How does that benefit the continuation of the society? There is nothing for the society in that). The real agenda is to make marriage meaningless for all.

DOMA imposes same restrictions on everyone, gay or straight. A gay man's marriage to another man is not recognized by the Feds, just like that of a straight man's marriage to another man is not recognized by the Feds. Where is the question of unequal treatment under the law? The Supreme Court cannot rule against DOMA without allowing the Feds to further encroach into states' rights, on one hand and unilaterally going against the will of the people expressed in DOMA, on the other hand.

Marriage is more than a covenant between one man and one woman. It has other precepts like one cannot marry someone who is already married to someone else. or that one cannot marry one's own sibling... Once one precept is allowed to fall, the other precepts will succumb too. I do not think the gay agenda is to add societal endorsement of marriage to gay relationships (How does that benefit the continuation of the society? There is nothing for the society in that). The real agenda is to make marriage meaningless for everyone.

Marriage is more than a covenant between one man and one woman. It has other precepts like one cannot marry someone who is already married to someone else. or that one cannot marry one's own sibling... Once one precept is allowed to fall, the other precepts will succumb too. I do not think the gay agenda is to add endorsement of marriage to their relationships. The real agenda is to make marriage meaningless for everyone.