1 - 10 Next
I hang my head in shame at the folks who elect these politicians. But then they are right on track if the objective is rot, waste and fraud. Socialism has no track record of failing on that objective.
The flaw is in the ideology not with the person. Mrs. Clinton or any other liberal/progressive would have been different in degree of the application of the ideology, not in the substance of it. It is unfortunate that a majority in this country, has bought this hook, line and sinker. Hopefully they experienced its devastation first hand and we will see a different outcome in 2016. I have my reservations though.
Warren is on the left of Obama. Hard to do, but she is.
Agree 100%. IMO, Walker has an edge: the experience of running the democrats out of state.
Democrats are a party of buffoons.
He wastes in billions, millions appear like chump change.
"Maybe they'll want alligators in the moat.". That was the President's response to 2011 republican demand for building walls on the boarder and securing it. Now, after $3.7 billion is spent, we will have merely transported the recent tide of trespassers back to their countries and no walls to show for the spending. Waste and moral decay is not the result of liberal agenda, it is the liberal agenda.
"Maybe they'll want alligators in the moat.". That was the President's response to republican demand for building walls on the boarder. Now, after $3.8 billion, we will have merely transported the recent tide of trespassers back to their countries. Waste and moral decay is not the result of liberal agenda, it is the liberal agenda.
The answer depends on whether or not you consider dis-incentivizing employment is bad thing.
Shouldn't serve to public what fails at home. But then she is a liberal and elitist soft tyranny is part and parcel of that outlook..
1 - 10 Next