In response to:

Gay Activists’ Double Standard

Jack 486 Wrote: Apr 02, 2013 2:14 PM
I am all for civil union designation on a state level that gives gay couples the exact same rights & benefits as married couples, but I do not support redefining the definition of marriage. Am I being unreasonable?
Becca in TX Wrote: Apr 02, 2013 4:07 PM
The elephant in the room is adoption. Lately it seems like half of the 30 something women I know are deciding that they're lesbians. They leave their husbands and move in with girlfriends. My grandaughter has been telling me how much all of the kids involved hate having a lesbian mother, hate mom's girlfriends, etc. What are we doing to our kids?
Chries Wrote: Apr 02, 2013 2:19 PM
Well, Jack, the problem with your reasonable view is that it fails to force society to endorse and approve of gay relationships by equating gay unions with real marriage.

Gay activists know they’ve lost the moral high ground when even their supporters are laughing at their double standards and hypocrisy.

Last week, Slate published a video compilation titled “Flashback: When Democrats swore they would never back gay marriage.” It showed Democrats like Hilary Clinton and Harry Reid affirming that marriage is a covenant between one man and one woman. Alex Knepper, a writer for the Huffington Post and a gay man himself, posted the video on Facebook with the caption, “Look at these bigots.”

He was being sarcastic, of course. Liberals and Democrats are never considered bigots.

The most...