In response to:

Marriage: A Supreme Test of Rights

Jack2894 Wrote: Mar 04, 2013 4:41 PM
DOug, the thrust of this point isn't race. This is about the nature of an argument. The rejected argument against inter-racial marriage is exactly the same as teh argument advanced against gay marriage. The argument is wrong regardless of the topic.

From the very beginning, homosexual “marriage” activists have sought to hijack not only the moral authority of the Civil Rights Movement, but also the legal arguments which liberated minorities from centuries of legalized oppression and discrimination.

After decades of aggressive activism, the common sense understanding of marriage has become almost hopelessly mired in incomprehensible legal terminology. It becomes difficult for everyday observers to navigate the convoluted logic homosexual activists employ as they attempt to remake one of civilization’s oldest institutions. The argument that redefining marriage to include homosexual couples is only “fair” rests on a specious interpretation of the equal protection...