In response to:

10 Facts for Liberals: Why Gun Control Can't Stop Another Newtown Massacre

jack1466 Wrote: Dec 22, 2012 5:30 PM
Its really quite scary,,that those who are demanding gun control/give the UN the right to dictate no one owns/has a gun except military personell/police and to destroy our 2nd admendent,,walk around protected by weapon carrying body guards,,to me that falls under the realm of control..
rhinegarten Wrote: Dec 22, 2012 5:38 PM
If the UN is given that much power in this country, they'll be controlling more than guns.

They'll be telling you how much space you can live in, how much fuel and other energy you can consume in a given period of time, and how much food you can eat, how many children you can have and how you must raise them.

There are now calls from the Left for gun control legislation in response to Adam Lanza's unconscionable mass killing of innocent children at Sandy Hook Elementary. However, very few people seem to be asking the most basic question of all before getting started: What gun control legislation could have stopped Adam Lanza?

The answer is "none."

Let's consider a few alternatives:

1) The school was already a "gun free zone;" so obviously that wasn't effective. Of course, the sort of people who would respect a "gun free zone" in the first place are the very ones you wouldn't have to worry...