Previous 11 - 20 Next
Very, very bad law. What it really does, is give controls over the gun to the government. It would be very easy for the government to insert a small command in the software that would render the gun useless if the DOJ (or other governmental agency) decided you shouldn't have access to a gun (as in something like is happening in the Ukraine). Then, you are defenseless against the fascist federal government that the founders tried to warn us about.
In response to:

CPAC 2013: Failing the Next Generation

J314 Wrote: Mar 19, 2013 7:10 PM
CPAC was nothing but another Republican Establishment exhibition of self-interest. This article was spot on, and CPAC shows it is really becoming irrelevant in the world of ideas - they have nothing new except new ways to feather the nest of, and ensure control of, the party by current, establishment (boring) Republicans.
I think I love Alana Stewart even more than I did.
In response to:

The New Rules for Radicals

J314 Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 8:42 AM
Can't get enough of yourself, TunTavern? You have to Reply to your own post? More than just a little arrogant, you are.
In response to:

The New Rules for Radicals

J314 Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 8:40 AM
She has played any angle she can to get air time on different shows. She tried FoxNews channel in a variety of things, but didn't just gel (primarily due to her rather Moderate to left 'tudes). Now MSNBC is 'her thing' and you can expect more Communist men with big hands to come over to shake hers'.
In response to:

The New Rules for Radicals

J314 Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 8:38 AM
Those two Big Barbaras poked out front?
In response to:

The New Rules for Radicals

J314 Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 8:36 AM
Yes, he worked with the Dems, and gave us our first immigration shamNesty law in 1986 (partially crafted by his VP, Bush) that has led us down the garden path to more Hispanic votes for Democrat ascendency. Reagan is NOT Mr. Wonderful, he has his warts.
In response to:

The New Rules for Radicals

J314 Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 8:33 AM
What is a little scary is to see how many Democrat-leaning people are trying to run for office in the Republican party. One is Geraldo talking about running as a Republican in New Jersey for Senate. Another is a retired air force female who is actively running in Arizona for a congressional seat. This lady has made disparaging remarks of many things associated with males, hates FoxNews (like all liberals), and has such a huge ego that she regularly holds up herself as a paragon of heroic proportions. These stealth candidates need to be slapped down hard in the primaries.
In response to:

The New Rules for Radicals

J314 Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 8:31 AM
She said nothing about sucker-punching, you did. Typical Leftist scumified trick.
In response to:

The New Rules for Radicals

J314 Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 8:30 AM
Sorry, but he has no idea how to communicate an idea well. It isn't a popularity contest if you open your mouth and insert foot.
In response to:

The New Rules for Radicals

J314 Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 8:28 AM
This is one of the best articles where we need to move as a party and a nation, that I've read in the last few years. It does espouse some positions I have been trying to get people to listen to, in particular, that bipartisanship is important to achieve, but not in the supine way Boehner tends to do it. Also, many Latin American immigrants are the kind of people we want in the US. What differs is to let them fall into the welfare system created by the Dems. And drop the racism thing...that's way past reason.
Previous 11 - 20 Next