1 - 10 Next
lol - what an image, a louse, wet with yellow liquid, thinking that is the latest skin product.
Don't make yourself obviously, noticeably idjitlike.
Manipulation of laws and paying illegals under the table.
In response to:

Obama's Unnecessary, Unpromising War

J314 Wrote: Sep 14, 2014 8:52 AM
Let me get this right. Chapman believes that using air power as part of a strategy to strike back at the Islamic State is wrong? Does this mean that fighting a 'war/ police action/ containment action', whatever, is not correct? His article certainly takes a tone that doing anything against them is wrong by the US. He tries to backstep a little at the end, but not enough to undo all the bad he put forward early. It sounds purely political in nature. Maybe he thinks it is better to sit on our hands until Kerry can put together a good coalition to fight the enemy, er, pardon me, "the poor disenfranchised Islamists who just want to fight against bad US policy" before we do anything? In Pakistan, the people actually thought we were helping the bad guys (security forces) stay in power and helped contribute to the assassination of Benazir Bhutto. THAT is why many Pakistanis believe the US is the enemy.
OMG, from the sublime to the ridiculous, the NBA is nothing but an organization of simpletons. So he outs himself because of something he wrote two years ago, and it was questioning the economics of not having enough season ticket holders (you know, that group with more money than sense) because of the under-representation of white attendees and ticket holders. Think he just wants to unload a franchise headed for hard times and doesn't want to have a prospective buy alerted for the real reason he wants to sell the team.
No reason they needed that information. Unless they were going to give it to an anti-gun group and get it published like they have done in other jurisdictions. Best they do an investigation on these three and see if they are affiliated with any other anti-Constitutional groups.
Today we also learn that Obama has had over a year of briefings on ISIS that were warning him of this group that was hogging the weapons provided to the 'resistance fighters in Syria', and the threat they posed. So, with that in mind, he still makes an idiotic comment that they don't have a strategy, yet, as if this all just came to him? I think he was too preoccupied with ways of 'transforming the USA' by figuring out how to let illegals become citizens. But wait, he'll have more 'flexibility' after the midterms when, no matter how he dismantles the Constitution, there will be no more elections until his tenure is nigh gone. Woe is the USA.
In response to:

Ted Cruz 2016?

J314 Wrote: Sep 01, 2014 6:56 PM
Dave, yes, Emir O won twice without any governance, but people seem to completely miss the point with the Emir, He Doesn't Care. He is politically driven, not practically driven to actually run a country. That is NOT his goal. His goal is to transform the USA by the end of his term, so that it is well-nigh impossible to excise his processes without causing either mass rebellion in the underclass, or end up in the legal system which would result in a 90% paralysis of the government.
In response to:

Ted Cruz 2016?

J314 Wrote: Sep 01, 2014 6:53 PM
A slightly off-topic comment - does anyone have any question in their mind how Ted would react to Putin's thuggery in Ukraine? I think his reaction would be straightforward, but extremely well thought out and resulting in Putin's embarrassed retreat.
In response to:

Ted Cruz 2016?

J314 Wrote: Sep 01, 2014 6:48 PM
Nitts.
1 - 10 Next