In response to:

Candy Crowley: No Regrets on that Misleading Fact-Check In Front of 65 Million People

IRGallagher Wrote: Dec 09, 2012 6:29 PM
Without even bringing in Benghazi, consider the lack of vetting Obama. After four years, we don't know any more about him than we did in '07. He is the true Manchurian candidate. And remember, his first act as prez was sealing his records. Where is the judge he and Axelrod used when running for US Senate to unseal Ryan's divorce records to smear him and force him out of contention. The really sad thing is that anything in a divorce record would cause conservatives/Republicans to pull their support. I think the Right really shoots themselves in the foot consistently. Assuming this last election was not rife with voter fraud (which I and many believe), Romney should have slam-dunked Obama. But...

On Friday, Hugh Hewitt asked CNN anchor Candy Crowley about her infamous fact-check heard 'round the world during the "town hall style" presidential debate at Hofstra University.  Her general self-assessment?  The journalistic equivalent of a solid B-plus:
 

HH: I have to begin by asking you about the debate, obviously, since it’s the first time I’ve talked to you since then. Looking back at not just your role but the media generally, are you happy with how it turned out? Is it pride, misgivings or both?

CC: Do you mean about the...