In response to:

History Lesson: Under Fascist Bush, Democrats Feared Tyranny

inkling_revival Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 11:37 AM
You are correct when you note that the Fed leans a little -- a little -- in the direction of fascism. And, yes, far too many politicians on both sides of the aisle have become acclimated to the size, reach, and cost of the federal government, which is beyond ridiculous. But thesupport and protection for the largest business enterprises does not come from the Rs, it comes entirely from the Ds. It's the Ds who are fascists; the Rs are just captives.
talltexanoilfieldtrash Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 2:45 PM
When did obummer do any of the things you are complaining that Bush did not do? Never? No point for you. paulus.
Paulus Textor Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 1:57 PM
IR, if the Repubs really did not support protection of the largest business enterprises, Reagan would not have bailed out Chrysler. Bush II, when R's had control of both executive and legislative branches, would have called for an end to agricultural subsidies, minimum price rules, protectionist quotas and tariffs, subsidies for "green" (ironic quotes) energy, and abolition of the Department of Energy.

Before breakfast. Then he would have kept going. But clearly, he was not one to rock the corporatist boat.

Once upon a time, a group of people known as the "Democrats" expressed great fear of tyranny by government.This was a time long, long ago, when a man from a place called Texas, representing a people known as the Republicans, occupied the White House. Leaders of the Democrats feared tyranny by the Republicans and called the man from Texas racist, oppressive and tyrannical.

To refresh your recollection, we offer a few examples from the distant past:

Billionaire Democratic contributor George Soros. He said the George W. Bush White House displayed the "supremacist ideology of Nazi Germany" and that Bush's administration...