In response to:

10 Facts for Liberals: Why Gun Control Can't Stop Another Newtown Massacre

inkling_revival Wrote: Dec 22, 2012 9:24 PM
Progressives, in general, seem to be long on self-congratulation but short on character development. Since they regard good and evil almost entirely in political terms, they can't have paid much attention to learning virtues and overcoming vices. That's why such people are so often vindictive, sneaky, verbally abusive, and dishonest -- they don't think those things are wrong. So, yeah, they probably are not to be trusted with firearms. They may be telling the truth about using weapons if they had them.
inkling_revival Wrote: Dec 22, 2012 9:39 PM
I'm talking about progressives. Most progressives are Democrats. Not all Democrats are progressives.
YESWECAN Wrote: Dec 22, 2012 9:33 PM
If you are talking about Democrats don't beat around the bush just say it straight out!

There are now calls from the Left for gun control legislation in response to Adam Lanza's unconscionable mass killing of innocent children at Sandy Hook Elementary. However, very few people seem to be asking the most basic question of all before getting started: What gun control legislation could have stopped Adam Lanza?

The answer is "none."

Let's consider a few alternatives:

1) The school was already a "gun free zone;" so obviously that wasn't effective. Of course, the sort of people who would respect a "gun free zone" in the first place are the very ones you wouldn't have to worry...