After 100 years of compromise with the progressives, what do we have? Marxism reigns, the free market is close to dead, the country is bankrupt. If anything passes the house I will be changing my party affiliation to unaffiliated.

BTW - the timeline shows the murderer was shooting people for 15 minutes. . If there had been an armed teacher or armed adult in the building he would not have been able to walk around a school for 15 minutes -- FIFTEEN MINUTES -- shooting students, he would likely have been shot before he made it down the hall.

In NO way did he destroy her. She talked right over him and ignored every thing he said. The libs were probably cheering in the background. If he wanted to destroyer her he needed to draw the conclusion for her, since she is a moron, and state it to her face. "Gun laws disarm the innocent and allow the murdered to kill as many of them as he wants." "It like throwing sheep into a fox den" "If any adult at that school had been armed this guy would not have been able to walk around killing with impunity, he would NOT have killed as many people and he may not have gone there at all." "Gun free zones are death traps" "Almost every mass murder has been done in a gun free zone"

If you want to make an argument for guns beyond the constitutional and keeping govt in check, you should focus on the victims. 1) In Britain where there are no gun rights the "home invasion" rate is 45% versus just under 13% for the U.S. 2) Women, young girls and the elderly are least able to defend themselves during a break-in 3) According to a USDOJ 38% of assaults & 60% of rapes occur during home invasions. Do you really want to be defenseless? In the UK over 90% of murders are done with knives, clubs, fists, strangulation, etc. - The UK ban on guns 1997 had no measurable effect in the UK murder rate, only how people were murdered.

According to your own writing you are an Butt????

My beef is that an objective person paid to publish an article should not parrot another article without evaluating the basic assumptions. Anyone who grew up in the states or the UK should know that they have a lower murder rate and obviously with fewer guns around have a lower "murder with a gun" rate. To imply otherwise is foolish. Also to claim US murders are falling and not state that UK murders are falling as well is deceptive. If she wants to be taken seriously then she needs to do her homework. If she wants to be a parrot, she is on the right track, but then readers should know that her work is unreliable. That said, I've never had a problem with her articles before so maybe this article was just different.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/10shrtbl03.xls

LOL - your name is Duke Nuk'em and you are talking credibility? Cicero purposely mangles my handle and you talk about childish? Facts are facts. If you want to deny facts and blame it on "name calling" go ahead. But if you were an objective individual you'd dig out the facts, like I did.

That is my gripe. People like you trust Katie and this article is a joke. Sad really. She has really let you down.

Versus a politician that was trying to get increase "crime fighting" money. Yeah, I'll stick with the cop vs the politician.

Keep your head in the sand idiot. I'm not going to pour through the source data for you - that was Katie's job and she failed miserably.