In response to:

Sandy Hook Father: My Child Is Safer at Home Where I am Armed

InAmericaSince1627 Wrote: Feb 05, 2013 10:43 AM
I believe all human life begins with equal value. It is the decisions each makes that alter that value to society. So with children, which life is more valuable. Which needs defense more than another. With the proposals set forth by the Liberals we clearly see that they want all life at greater risk by removing the method of resistance to evil. By his proposed legislation and public comments, Obama is telling you his daughters are more valuable than yours. Back to my second sentence, political attempts to remove my personal security reduce the value of your life in my world.
Elizabeth420 Wrote: Feb 05, 2013 10:46 AM
InAmerica: Those on the Left are always willing to sacrifice the children of others in order to engage
in the "social engineering" or political gerrymandering of which they are so fond. It's all a game to
them, as they work to undermine & destroy every last tenet, belief & principle on which our (formerly)
great nation was premised.

During a recent gun violence prevention public hearing in Hartford, Connecticut, Bill Stevens, a father of a Sandy Hook student who survived the massacre that took place in December, testified. Stevens explained why his daughter is safer at home than she is at school because "911" and "lockdown" are not enough to protect her from an evil person. Stevens also defended the right to bear arms which is not only written in the Second Amendment, but in the Connecticut constitution as well. He argued gun owners shouldn't be turned into suspects no matter how many firearms or rounds of ammunition...