In response to:

Drone Lobbyist Objects to Word "Drone"

Imiss40 Wrote: Mar 24, 2013 3:40 PM
Me too. Don'tcha hate it when the libtrolls - who should be ignored when doing this - hijack a thread and suck in the regular contributors?
TommyMaq Wrote: Mar 24, 2013 4:28 PM
" Ronpaul has never been anywhere close to the nomination for President? "

So your theory is that the GOP committed election fraud in their own primaries to shut Paul out...because he *wasn't* close to the nomination?

There is only one problem with your theory...
BudWiser Wrote: Mar 24, 2013 3:46 PM
what? you mean the fact that Ronpaul has never been anywhere close to the nomination for President?

in how many runs with the same tires schtick?

GustaveMolinari Wrote: Mar 24, 2013 3:43 PM
I don't mind Bud so much. He's alright. Just confused about facts.

The use of unmanned aerial vehicles in the United States' counterterrorism measures has come under intense scrutiny, most prominently during Sen. Rand Paul's marathon filibuster on March 6. Sen. Paul raised the issue with regard to the Obama Administration potentially using the tactic within the legal boundaries of the United States, and against American citizens abroad.

Of course, Sen. Paul and the media at large rarely use the term "unmanned aerial vehicle." In the course of Sen. Paul's filibuster, he used the term precisely once. He said "drone" 245 times. Now the President and CEO of the Association for...