In response to:

Women Serving in Combat Positions Is a Batty Idea

imhistory Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 10:54 AM
You forgot foul mouthed, foul actioned Kathy Griffen. I think she could shock and awe anyone who is decent.
ByeBye2ndAmendment Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 10:56 AM
Wow, you're the first person to have mentioned poor Kathy Grffin in 2 years. She'll probably send you flowers.

Last Thursday Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and other U.S. military leaders lifted the ban on women serving in combat positions. I, for one, think this is a great idea and have a few modest proposals, if the brass inside the beltway is open to suggestions, on how they should deploy the dames (and whom they should deploy).

First off, if you truly want to eviscerate the enemy—namely Muslims—then I propose sending the most nerve grating and foul women Hollywood has to offer straight into hot zones as our forward armies. I’m a thinkin’ starting off with Roseanne Barr, Joy...

Sunday, May 26 | 10:46 PM ET
Sunday, May 26 | 10:46 PM ET
Sunday, May 26 | 10:46 PM ET
Sunday, May 26 | 10:46 PM ET