In response to:

Legitimate Rape Arguments

IAdmitIAmCrazy Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 8:07 PM
Mother of 4, we are entering into dishonesty territory. You simply DECLARE that a zygote is a "human being" and then use that as a tool to badger me with the GENERALIZATION of "selected, superior classES of human beingS hav[ing] rights while other, lesser human beings may be freely slaughtered for the convenience of those who do have rights." Conveniently, this invokes all sorts of dark and sinister insinuations. I respect that you consider a zygote a human being but I expect you to also respect that BECAUSE I do see an essential differences between a zygote and an essentially viable and sentient embryo I would not IN GENERAL differentiate between selected, higher classES of human beingS (note your defamatory plurals).
The_Nerd_Warrior Wrote: Aug 28, 2012 2:23 AM
To say that a zygote is a human being is far less arbitrary than to say it occurs at some subjective, nebulous later period of development.

The only difference between a zygote and an adult is size, complexity, and raw materials. Just like the difference between a six-year-old child and an adult.

I'll say it again: If you cannot be SURE you're not killing a human being, and you're doing it anyway, you obviously place little value on human life. There are simply no ifs, ands, or buts about this.
DocJ Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 9:15 PM
Dear Crazy, like your name,
I respect your right to your opinion, but you don't have a right to change the meaning of words. Please stick with what words actually mean, and don't impose a new meaning. Do you know what a zygote is? No one can abort a zygote, since there is no sign it is there until it starts to divide and becomes an embryo. There are ethical issues with zygotes, I admit it is a difficult subject, but this is about abortion, not about fertilized eggs.

I am quesy about the whole rape exception issue, because on the one hand it is cruel for a woman to have to carry an embryo after a rape. Yet, if an embryo is a developing human, are we not killing him or her because of something his / her father did? Is that ethical?
shubi_ Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 9:24 PM
Crazy left and you are crazy to try to reason with the troll.
IAdmitIAmCrazy Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 8:11 PM
To me, like to you, there is only ONE class of human beings. We disagree on WHEN the inclusion starts.
shubi_ Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 8:13 PM
Could you please kill yourself, because I can't imagine any mother wanted you.
IAdmitIAmCrazy Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 8:14 PM
This of course still referred to Mo4.

On the other: I wonder if among conservatives it is morrally correct to entice someone to take his own life ....
shubi_ Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 8:16 PM
Could you please kill yourself, because I can't imagine any mother wanted you.
Original Saepe__Expertus Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 8:47 PM
No...it is ENTIRELY inappropriate.
shubi_ Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 9:03 PM
Lighten up General. This troll has been spamming all day.
DocJ Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 9:17 PM
shubi, please, your repeated insult lowers our standards. Do we not have an obligation to behave?
shubi_ Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 9:24 PM
It would just be perceived as weakness by our enemies.
Don't be such a wuss.
Todd Akin’s grossly irresponsible remarks about “legitimate rape” and conception have received much media attention. As well they should. The sheer weirdness of the remarks calls into question both his intelligence and his personal integrity. How could someone conclude logically that a rape victim’s body has the capacity to prevent conception in the wake of sexual assault? And why would someone assert that the conclusion had been supported by doctors with whom he had spoken? Clearly, Akin contrived the idea on the spot and then contrived the claim that there were doctors who had informed and/or supported his assertion. All of...