In response to:

Andrea Mitchell Corrects Guest Who Called Herself "Pro-Life": "Anti-Abortion Is More Value-Neutral"

humbleman Wrote: Jan 09, 2013 11:05 PM
20% of the US population murdered by there own mothers. the largest infanticide ever commited and we worry about the 16 children shot in a school by a lunatic. the liberals will never cease to amaze me in there rationalizations.sadly the amazment i feel makes me want to throw up. they go on the warpath trying to take our rights away becuase of one lunatic but ignore the legal murders everyday done by MOTHERS,
jgraham887 Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 9:46 AM
Well said except; would you please run your stuff through a grammar/spell checker? You're making conservatives look bad.
evie10 Wrote: Jan 09, 2013 11:22 PM
there, their, they're - learn the differences please.
itsnotaboutyou Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 1:51 AM
evie10: Yeah, whatever...humbleman needs to brush up on grammar. However, he has a good point in his comment. The loss of the children in that school is tragic. But hundreds of pre-born are killed every day. Where is the outrage over that?

My (rhetorical) question is this: Why would a pro-abortion--or, "pro-choice" if you're looking for something more value neutral--advocate like Andrea Mitchell want the issue of life and death to be "value-neutral"?

Here's a little nugget I came across today from Pastor John MacArthur: "They keep saying, 'A school is supposed to be a safe place!' Yeah well so is a womb."