1 - 10 Next
In response to:

In Denial About the Attack in France

Huh? Wrote: Jan 14, 2015 9:11 AM
Fat boy, Li'l Kim didn't attend either. Thus, Dear Leader and Dear Leader, were both absent.
If homosexuality were to be discovered to be genetic - as incredibly doubtful as that may be - it would be the end of homosexuality. People would simply have their child tested in the womb, and abort the unwanted "product of conception". Ever met a parent that wanted their child to grow up to be a homosexual? Neither have I.
They aren't "gay". They are homosexual. They are perverts, or sexual deviants, if you like. Why do people let the deviants frame the debate?
To paraphrase Vladimir Lenin, "Everything is permitted for the good of the collective."
Might want to take that up with the Creator. In the beginning, He decreed, "a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh. So they are no longer two, but one flesh." That kinda, sorta, pretty much, leaves a responsibility, with His earthly representatives.
In response to:

DWS: Dems Will Hold the Senate

Huh? Wrote: Oct 20, 2014 10:02 PM
In order for women to advance in the Democratic Party, are they required to be beaten to within an inch of their lives, by 300 angry men, wielding oversize ugly sticks? Dang. That woman gives me the cold willies.
In response to:

Navy Removes Bibles From Guest Rooms

Huh? Wrote: Aug 12, 2014 9:58 PM
Some one needs to explain to the bigots at the Freedom From Ration Thought Foundation, that allowing religion, is not the same as endorsing religion. According to the Supremes, the government can't display animosity toward religion - which is what they are doing by removing the Bibles.
In response to:

About Those Dirty Little Sisters of the Poor

Huh? Wrote: Jul 21, 2014 8:54 AM
"NOW, which considers government-mandated birth control a greater right than that of religious groups to run their organizations according to their religious principles" Bingo!
Those among us experiencing cognitive dissonance, simply need to embrace Newspeak. The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of IngSoc (English Socialism), but to make all other modes of thought impossible. It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought -- that is, a thought diverging from the principles of IngSoc -- should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words.
I'm shocked! Shocked! The Hillary is incompetent? Shocking! She will make an excellent proglodyte president. She is definitely qualified. After all, not everyone is an incompetent.
1 - 10 Next