Previous 21 - 30 Next
In response to:

20 Questions Liberals Can't Answer

Huguenot Wrote: Apr 20, 2013 5:27 PM
So it's okay for a child inside an orphanage and living off its system, to be killed? It's the choice of the orphanage, right?
As if I didn't already like Katie Pavlich enough.
In response to:

'Proportional' Response

Huguenot Wrote: Apr 09, 2013 8:18 PM
And this has what to do with anything Jim Gile, a Kansas County Official? Inge Marler? Are you serious? How about you tell us how you feel about the racist comments of Harry Reid, Joe Biden and almost any liberal that ever had anything to say about a black conservative? Just for a start. Hypocritical moron.
In response to:

'Proportional' Response

Huguenot Wrote: Apr 09, 2013 8:13 PM
Who other than NK is "beating war drums?" And who's talking pre-emptive anything? Did you actually read the article? Are you sure proportional beats anything? After all, it was in large part what lost us the Vietnam war.
In response to:

'Proportional' Response

Huguenot Wrote: Apr 09, 2013 8:11 PM
Sorry, forgot to give the author and pilot's name, Tom Wilson.
In response to:

'Proportional' Response

Huguenot Wrote: Apr 09, 2013 8:10 PM
You are exactly right. Vietnam was where we employed "proportional response" and where it failed. It's not as if we don't have experience to go by. Author and F-105 pilot said that Hanoi was so important to the North Vietnamese psyche and identity that if we had bombed it, the war would have been over in two weeks. And to humanitarian objections, he pointed out that most civilians had been evacuated from Hanoi and it turned into an armed camp. On the other hand, we had no qualms about bombing civilians in Berlin, Hamburg, Dresden, Tokyo, Yokohama, Nagoya... But to answer your question, I think the left did learn from our experience in Vietnam - how to avoid winning a war.
In response to:

'Proportional' Response

Huguenot Wrote: Apr 09, 2013 8:05 PM
"You start a war, and we will put an end to your country and reunite the Korean peninsula." You are exactly, 100% right. Which pretty much guarantees that that's exactly what the preezy won't do.
In response to:

'Proportional' Response

Huguenot Wrote: Apr 09, 2013 8:04 PM
My only problem witth Dr. Sowell's column is that he didn't mention that the U.S. has employed "proportional response" before. In Vietnam. It was the doctrine that guided the militarily ignorant pointy-head academics like McNamara and Bundy in the Johnson administration in every response to North Vietnam, and it was one of the things that pretty much guaranteed our defeat there. My question is, are Barack Obama and his advisors so ignorant that they don't know this, or are they so stupid that they do and are going with it anyway? Not that it really matters. They can always be counted on to do exactly the wrong thing in every situation.
In response to:

What the Meaning of 'Infringe' Is

Huguenot Wrote: Jan 13, 2013 2:55 AM
t252, I know it's tempting, but don't feed the trolls, it only encourages them.
Another false argument. I've not argued either that believers are incapable of good or that all evil is from non-believers. What I argue is simply that you are mistaken to judge Christ by the actions of those who claim belief in him while acting in a way completely contrary to his commands. It really isn't complicated.
Not sure who you're replying to here. But NTS does not apply because while there is no way to define a "true" Scotsman, Jesus clearly defined what ACTIONS define his followers.
Previous 21 - 30 Next