In response to:

The Republican Rape Dilemma

HornIt Wrote: Oct 27, 2012 12:54 AM
The sad thing is you probably believe your position on this is some kind of proven science or even the more rational position, and it's simply not. Nobody is advocating slavery, but you very well may be advocating the destruction of human life, so I'll leave it to you to decide where you fall in the moral hierarchy. And let's not forget that so called "clump of cells" aren't just the woman's cells. Half the DNA is the man's, yet you demand eminent domain simply because it exists within your womb, which by logical extension must mean you also own the male part during intercourse and may do with it whatever you wish while it obviously counts as "your body". By the way, when does "the last couple weeks of pregnancy" begin?

As Richard Mourdock’s Indiana Senate fate hinges on how voters absorb his views on rape, all conservatives have an opportunity for a look in the mirror.

Just how pro-life do we want to be?

The Mourdock controversy is nothing like Todd Akin’s self-inflicted wound in Missouri, the result of an embrace of just plain bad medical information.

Mourdock is in hot water for accurately (if not particularly skillfully) articulating what God instructs about the life of the unborn.

If he is on politically shaky ground, it is because he had the courage to stand on the...

Friday, May 24 | 01:50 AM ET
Friday, May 24 | 01:50 AM ET
Friday, May 24 | 01:50 AM ET
Friday, May 24 | 01:50 AM ET