1 - 10 Next
Don't purge and try winning national elections without libertarians and TEA Partiers. How's that worked so far?
Bit of a drag on the conversation, ain't he? I hope he takes that other idiot Quintus Cicero (as if!) with him.
A vote for Gary Johnson is vote FOR - wait for it - GARY JOHNSON. If Johnson weren't running and your choices were bad (Mittens) or worse (Obama) then you might be justified in holding your nose and choosing the lesser of two evils. The fact that every election since Nixon in '68 - and probably before that - have been framed by the Repugnicons as "the most important of our time - or ever - is beside the point completely. If Johnson reflects your views then vote for him. Vote FOR him. If in the future libertarians (like me) who have decided to hitch their wagons to the Stupid Party in hopes of changing it from within should manage to get a classic liberal on the ticket, then by all means vote Repugnicon. Mittens, however, ain't that guy.
In response to:

Obama's Game Changes

hoosiertoo Wrote: Oct 11, 2012 8:14 PM
Obama voter? You make almost as much sense.
In response to:

Obama's Game Changes

hoosiertoo Wrote: Oct 11, 2012 7:25 PM
So when did the Stupid Party nominate a CONSERVATIVE candidate? I must have missed that...
You mean, like Soros, et al?
I'm intolerant of libtard politicians.
In response to:

You Can't Teach Liberals Anything

hoosiertoo Wrote: Sep 26, 2012 10:51 AM
Dunno about Lance, I have. So has my wife. Public schools stink and most teachers are little better than babysitters; a sizeable minority are even lousy baysitters,
In response to:

Making 'Earthquakes' for Romney

hoosiertoo Wrote: Sep 26, 2012 10:39 AM
With some notable exceptions amongst the commentariat - Cavuto, f'rinstance - the gerbils run on the propanda wheel at Fox also. I wish CNS News had a TV prescence.
McLame was the mistake. Palin was the only reason I would have considered voting for the GOP ticket. I didn't, but it wasn't Palin's fault.
1 - 10 Next