Since Barack Obama's re-election, hundreds...
(cont'd) unless they enacted extreme pro-union labor laws. Conservatives know that unions are the backbone of Democrat power and requiring union participation in labor laws, and forced unionization of employees, would diminish conservative influence and lead to a permanent Democrat majority. That, of course, would lead to permanent unconstitutional overreach. So, in that case, would secession be caused by an objection to unions or by an objection to a powergrab that involves forced unionization? Preservation of slavery was an issue in exactly the same way. No, the irony of comparing unions and right to work states to slave and abolishionist states is not lost on me.
For decades, it has been obvious that there are irreconcilable differences between Americans who want to control the lives of others and those who wish to be left alone. Which is the more peaceful solution: Americans using the brute force of government to beat liberty-minded people into submission or simply parting company? In a marriage, where vows are ignored and broken, divorce is the most peaceful solution. Similarly, our constitutional and human rights have been increasingly violated by a government instituted to protect them. Americans who support constitutional abrogation have no intention of mending their ways.
- Scarborough: FL-13 upset shows 2014 will be “historic” Dem loss Ed Morrissey 34 minutes ago
- NBC/WSJ poll shows Obama approval at new low of 41% Ed Morrissey 1 hour ago
- Quotes of the day Allahpundit 10 hours ago
- GAO to audit Oregon’s failed ObamaCare exchange site Mary Katharine Ham 11 hours ago
- Video: Chris Matthews attempts a do-over during his live show Mary Katharine Ham 11 hours ago
- FL-13 special election: Jolly wins! Erika Johnsen 12 hours ago