1 - 10 Next
If you want a career in the Obama Admin, you've got to understand that you only real job is to protect the President. Why do you think that Susan Rice is still around?
In response to:

BREAKING: Eric Holder to Resign

HeroOfTheMasses Wrote: Sep 25, 2014 12:32 PM
Maybe someone can answer this question: does this mean that Dirty Harry will be able to push through a replacement in December before the new Senate is confirmed?
It's hard to justify long jail time when his crime didn't actually hurt anyone. If getting a DUI and/or domestic abuse doesn't get you jail time, should you really get it for violating a campaign finance law that had no effect on the outcome of any election? That being said, I am saddened that Dinesh did this. Authors have the ability to affect not just to sing to the choir, but to impact generations afterwards. How many conservatives are conservatives, because they read Buckley's God and Man at Yale? D'Souza isn't in Buckley's league (few were and none today are), but Illiberation Educiation is one of those books that has an effect beyond when it was written. Now, because of his conviction, I fear that many will just dismiss his past contributions .
About 2 decades ago, a friend of mine and I were having a conversation with a women about politics and the woman made reference to "pro-life Democrats". My friend bluntly stated "there's no such thing as a pro-life Democrat". The woman was visibly upset that my friend would say such a thing. Bart Stupak proved the point. Sure, some elected Democrats claim to be "pro-life" when they're running in non-liberal districts and they will cast pro-life votes - well, when their votes don't matter. But when their votes do matter, they will abandon those supposed pro-life beliefs faster quicker than Obama can get to a golf course. There is no such thing as a pro-life Democrat, there are only pro-abortion Democrats who are liars.
Remember boys and girls, it's not important whether you win or lose, but that you hold hands and do things together. /endsarcasm.
Well, he can't go in and wipe them out, because that sounds like a strategy that Bush would do and as we all know, the only consistent foreign policy that Obama has is that everything that Bush did was wrong.
The world actually needs more Geraldos - honest liberals. Seriously, in an arena of ideas, we'll beat honest liberals. Instead, 99% of liberals are of the dishonest sort. Instead of speaking like Geraldo, they'll utter drool such as "we want to protect hunter's rights, but we want limits on 'assault weapons'".
Liberal commentators throwing in a liberal line - who could have predicted that? We have to be ready for these things. Ronald Reagan's was the "there you go again" line. Romney's biggest problem was that he was trying to play a nuanced game that Barry wasn't "managing" things well, not that there was anything wrong with Barry's foreign policy. Unless you're a lot smarter than the guy that you're facing in the debate, nuanced "I would manage things better" arguments almost never work.
Henry, which of these things couldn't have been predicted? How does a man who has made $100mi + in business get "blindsided" when the Dems attacked his business record? Of course they were going to do that. Dems always do that, everywhere. Yet many Republicans find ways to overcome the lies and win elections. I have no reason to believe that Romney will get that figured out given a 2nd chance.
Sorry, that last sentence should read "Romney didn't want to be called a racist by the media".
1 - 10 Next