In response to:

What's Good for the Noose is Good for the Pander

HeraldOfGalactus Wrote: Nov 15, 2012 5:48 PM
You did not answer my question. You only repeated your previous statement. The logical shortcomings are the same. Why is the blueprint for this structure that you admit is a blueprint considered human? I'm not talking about what makes us human, but what constitutes a living human being. Science can only explain what happens at conception. My question is how do we determine when that chemical process becomes a human being?

Recently, Ann Coulter wrote a controversial column suggesting that numerous Republican losses in the 2012 election cycle could be tied to the GOP stance on abortion. After lamenting the problem, she suggested a solution: the GOP should officially abandon its opposition to the so-called rape exception to a ban on abortion.

Ann's position on this matter is wrong for three reasons. First, it is unprincipled. Second, it will not be received with the popular support she envisions. Third, it is not the best political response to the problem. After elaborating on each problem associated with Ann's position, I propose an...