In response to:

Super Bowl or Gay Equality Bowl

HeraldOfGalactus Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 12:49 PM
"Those marriages would be the exception, not the norm." It doesn't matter how rare a marriage is. It is still recognized. The law doesn't require that a marriage not be the norm to be valid. "Logically speaking, that still is the primary purpose of marriage. Anything else is just the standard liberal attempt at undermining marriage and basic unit of society - the nuclear family." That doesn't change the fact that the current law does not have child-rearing as a requirement. And until that changes, there's no merit to denying same-sex couples the same benefits. "Strawman. How does it effect your life if your neighbor beats his wife and kids at home?" Non-sequiter. You still haven't explained how either effects your marriage.

Is it too much to ask that the focus of this Sunday be on football and not on “gay rights”? Will I be branded as a homophobic bigot for daring to make such a request? (I can answer that already: Yes!)

Last week, Fox News ran the headline, “Baltimore Raven linebacker [Brendon Ayanbadejo] uses Super Bowl spotlight to promote gay marriage,” reporting that, “Hours after Ayanbadejo’s team beat the New England Patriots on Sunday, paving their way to football’s biggest game, the three-time Pro Bowl special teams player wrote an email to gay marriage proponents asking how he could use...