In response to:

It's Come to This: Sandra Fluke Nominated for Person of the Year

Henry VIII Wrote: Nov 28, 2012 1:18 PM
lois01 Wrote: 1 minute ago (1:12 PM) ...and Obama was handily re-elected. I would hardly call 51 percent handily reelected....but you keep gloating loweasse, getting reelected by promising free stuff doesn't make a productive policy or a presidency....your messiah's legacy will mark the stark and rapid decline of the a once Great Nation.
lois01 Wrote: Nov 28, 2012 1:22 PM
love the talking points; military and old people get the most free stuff!!!!
Libs_Are_UsefulIdiots Wrote: Nov 28, 2012 1:21 PM
These libs keep saying that "Obama was handily re-elected" while there is more and more evidence of MASSIVE voter fraud.

In fact, the FBI has been asked to look into the instances of electronic voting machines that registered a vote FOR Obozo, when the voter actually voted for Romney.

Henry VIII Wrote: Nov 28, 2012 1:24 PM
I believe that a lot of erroneous assumptions about this election will be revised and corrected as the evidence is uncovered.

Apparently in the year 2012 all you have to do to become nominated as TIME's Person of Year is throw away your dignity and beg your neighbors in front of Congress to pay for your sex life as a 30-year-old adult child. TIME asks readers, should Sandra Fluke be chosen as Person of the Year? Definitely? No way? Below is TIME's description:

As always, TIME's editors will choose the Person of the Year, but that doesn't mean readers shouldn't have their say. Cast your vote for the person you think most influenced the news this year...