CIS, NumbersUSA and FAIR are not reputable places for objective information. They are founded and funded by people like John Tanton, http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?sid=72 and they do not search for the truth, they produce what asked and paid for; they manipulate information in order to make it appear supporting their xenophobic agenda. The chief of NumbersUSA is a Master of Deception, http://www.freedomofmigration.com/roy-beck-the-master-of-deception/

So far illegal immigrants paying social security taxes, despite that they never would be able to use social, security services, saved your social security from going bankrupt. Hence, bow kindly to illegal immigrants, and say: “thank you”.

We do not need amnesty for illegal immigrants. They are here because Americans support laws suppressing legal immigration far below levels that economy could justify. This contradiction is the essence of the problem. If we acknowledge that our faulty immigration laws caused illegal immigration, and if we revoke them, the only amnesty we might consider it is amnesty for our legislators for not suing them for establishing the laws that caused the havoc and lawlessness of illegal immigrations. By revoking our 1986 immigration laws we would acknowledge that immigrants arriving here and working here and breaking the laws of 1986, de facto did not break any laws as the immigration laws of 1986 should be declared unconstitutional and thus inval

Most voices on this board are manifestation of the darkest sides of the human nature. They represent fears of unknown, they are the proof how dangerous are consequences of poor education of majority of Americans. Most voices on this board are shame for America. Most voices on this board represent ideas that have nothing in common with the values which laid at the foundation of our Republic. If you are a Catholic, you should tell your priest about your hate of immigrants during your next confession.

What will happen after we will kick out all people which your declared illegal? The problem is not with illegal immigrants. The problem is with people as you are who believe that they can achieve their goals not by working with others but by annihilating other. Whom we will need to kick out next? How long it will take that someone will decide to kick you out as well?

What is decent about creating laws that make other people illegal? Do not steal it is the God’s law. The law banning someone from coming from another country and working next to you is a man’s law. How you dare giving this law the same weight as the God’s law? How in your conscience you know that you did not break the God’s law (do not do anything to others that you do not want done to you) by establishing our immigration laws? Our immigration laws are immoral, and breach basic American values. Illegal immigrants, by breaking these laws should be calms of our conscience. Take a cold shower, and rethink the whole issue.

On the Dream Act issue, I have an old question to Mr. Romney: “Have you no sense of decency, sir?” http://www.freedomofmigration.com/chasing-illegal-immigrants/

I am puzzled that instead of finding a creative way to resolve our almost one hundred year old problem, in his political declarations Romney mindlessly follows an angry mob which is almost literally craving for the blood of illegal immigrants. Is he afraid that he has no chance of being elected by telling Americans as it is? Or, he actually does not know our problems and have no original ideas for what to do? I mean, besides following the mob mindlessly. The dilemma is Shakespearian, to lead or not to lead, that is the question, http://www.freedomofmigration.com/to-lead-or-not-to-lead/

By his approach to immigration Romney loses not only votes of young voters, but also some Americans who doubt his leaderships abilities. If he is as skillful and talented a businessman as he claims, how comes that he does not see the nonsense of our current immigration policy? How he cannot see the shallowness of the anti-immigration rhetoric? He supports entrepreneurship in America, and out of the other side of his mouth he promises to chase out illegal immigrants instead of assimilating them. He cannot do both at the same time. He lies at least in one of his two listed above claims.

By his approach to immigration Romney loses not only votes of Hispanics, but also some Americans who doubt his leaderships abilities. If he is as skillful and talented a businessman as he claims, how comes that he does not see the nonsense of our current immigration policy? How he cannot see the shallowness of the anti-immigration rhetoric? He supports entrepreneurship in America, and out of the other side of his mouth he promises to chase out illegal immigrants instead of assimilating them. He cannot do both at the same time. He lies at least in one of his two listed above claims. The dilemma is Shakespearian, to lead or not to lead, that is the question, http://www.freedomofmigration.com/to-lead-or-not-to-lead/