I'm sure that the author can figure out that the taxes the rich pay have no effect on where the jobs are added, since most jobs don't go to rich people. If it were to have an effect, it'd be the opposite to what the author implies. Taxing the rich more would allow the less rich to pay less, which would make it more affordable to hire in America, since it'd be possible to pay a little less and leave the worker with the same amount of income. However, the effect would be so small that only an incurable fanatic would make an issue out of it.
Editor's Note: This is part II in a series. Part I can be found here.
A small headline in the 2nd section of the Wall Street Journal last week told a bigger story than a lot of front page banner headlines. It said, "U.S. Firms Add Jobs, but Mostly Overseas."Just as there is no free lunch, there is no free class warfare. Some people may be inspired by President Obama's talk about making "the rich" pay their undefined "fair share" of taxes, or taking away corporations' "tax breaks." But talk is not always cheap. It can be very costly to...












"Taxing the rich more would allow the less rich to pay less..."
Two question for you genius.
1. How come Obama is not talking about a tax cut for the"less rich"?
2. How much less than "zero" can the 47% that pays no taxes pay?
The "rich", as defined by Obama's $200K/year standard, already pay roughly 84% of all taxes in this country.
Here's what you need to get through your head. The country set a record for tax revenues in Fiscal 2006 with $2. 56 trillion under Bush and the Republicans. The next year Pelosi and Reid became Speaker and Senate Majority Leader and it's gone downhill ever since.