Previous 11 - 20 Next
Suddenly the polls aren't 'suspicious' when they're said to favor Mittens. Laughable.
Grow up and grow a brain you freaking moron.
And, since trying to take away our Constitutional right to vote didn't work in the 0h-so-important swing states, the thugs now have to resort to getting their lurching dumbos out to intimidate Americans at the polls. Bullying asswankers. Just what we need.
True the Vote - yet another benign, sweet-sounding name trying to hide the insidious pile of crapola it really is - is nothing but a bunch of teabaggers bent on doing the dirty work of the Rethug Party in order to keep voters from hitting the polls in big numbers on election day. Nothing like a good old Rethug to ensure in ANY way possible that voter turnout isn't record numbers - because that is a sure sign rethugs will LOSE. The more people who vote, the more likely Mittens will LOSE. Can you imagine that? The thugs have to SUPPRESS the vote in order to win -- how sad!
It's pretty sad when batsh!tcrazy meets loser in the world of teabaggers. They are left with nothing except taking the President's words out of context, contorting their meaning and parsing the heck out of them in order to whip up the ignorati into a brainless rage. Yeah, you've got that right, dumbos. The wingnut hate machine is PLAYING you, once again. Have you LISTENED to the comment in full context? If you have, complete with the ENTIRE question that Stewart asked and the ENTIRE comment from President Obama, then you'd be shaking your head right now like the rest of us and saying "Oh-dear-GOD-please-make-these-idiots-on-the-right-STOP". You SHOULD be asshamed of your Party and it's sickos right now for politicizing these deaths.
In response to:

Obama's "Lady Parts" Campaign Rolls On

hazie Wrote: Oct 19, 2012 11:46 PM
You really think that this "lady parts" thing is working for you, eh, Cruella? There is something fundamentally wrong with you if you can't see that women CAN and DO function comprehensively - they don't decipher issues based on how their body parts work, like men do. They don't shut down the brain from their lady parts like men do with the head below the belt. But leave it to the dumbos on the right to cast us as lady parts stepford wives. How insulting, and from a woman, no less. Way to go, Cruella.
.....and McMahon said that a woman brutally raped needs to make sure that the ambulance doesn't take her to one of the Catholic hospitals, or she's out of luck. Which candidate do you think will win in CT? Yeah, you got it, dipshitz.
It takes a dumbo saying the stupid remark to make it a dumb campaign controversy. Enter Mitt! The thing about these talking points on Big Bird and Binders of Women is that the underlying sentiment behind them is key. Balancing the 7 trillion additions Mittens wants with cuts to, in his OWN words....Big Bird? And, suggesting he asked for and was granted "binders of women" to fulfill his gosh golly attempt to round out his cabinet with gals? GIVE US A BREAK! The women's group behind those binders told the world today that they BROUGHT mittens those names after he became Governor and instead of keeping up the numbers of women in high level positions in MA, he LOWERED that number during his term in office! Yeah -- FACT.
Cruella, Mittens actually got the binder FROM the women's group - he lied about ASKING for it. Also, they sought to get more women in high level leadership roles, but while Mittens toots about being the leader in the country on hiring women in his cabinet, he actually brought the percentage of MA women in those roles DOWN during his term. You read that correctly: Mittens took a relatively high percentage of women in high level roles in MA and REDUCED their number while he was in office.
In response to:

Anatomy of (Another) Paul Ryan Smear

hazie Wrote: Oct 17, 2012 4:05 PM
Gawd, why won't rethugs ever own up to the dimbulbery of their dumbos?
In response to:

Romney TV Ad: “The Choice”

hazie Wrote: Oct 17, 2012 4:00 PM
As the Tax Policy Center concluded, Romney’s plan can’t both exempt middle class families from tax cuts and remain revenue neutral. “He’s promised all these things and he can’t do them all. In order for him to cover the cost of his tax cut without adding to the deficit, he’d have to find a way to raise taxes on middle income people or people making less than $200,000 a year,” the Center found.
Previous 11 - 20 Next