In response to:

Women in Combat

Harrison Bergeron Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 8:24 AM
This has nothing to do with equality for women. If it were, there would be one standard for military service and any woman capable of meeting that standard would not only be allowed to serve -- they would also be eligible for the draft and duty-bound to fight if called, as it has always been for men. BO's goal is simply to destroy the "colonialists". Everything he does is understandable if you first understand that motivation. Staffing our military with women who are unfit to fight is just part of the strategy. But look on the bright side -- at least it will make the Federal forces easy to beat when the Union comes unglued.
Seawolf Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 8:34 AM
Spot on, his daddy tried to destroy the Kenyan gov't and he's just following the family tradition..impeach the bum.
InAmericaSince1627 Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 8:39 AM

A senior Defense Department official said the ban on women in combat should be lifted because the military's goal is "to provide a level, gender-neutral playing field." I'd like to think the goal of the military should be to have the toughest, meanest fighting force possible. But let's look at "gender-neutral playing field."

The Army's physical fitness test in basic training is a three-event physical performance test used to assess endurance. The minimum requirement for 17- to 21-year-old males is 35 pushups, 47 situps and a two-mile run in 16 minutes, 36 seconds or less. For females of the same age,...