In response to:

Why Did He Kill All Those Children?

Harrison Bergeron Wrote: Jan 02, 2013 2:30 PM
Why did it kill all those children? It killed all those children because it wanted to be noticed. And the bloodsucking muckrakers gleefully obliged by splattering its name across the airwaves for weeks on end, for the sake of pure evil -- same as the defective moron itself. If uttering the name of a suicide mass murderer in the press was illegal, Sandy Hook would be the last. We don't need gun control. We need PRESS CONTROL.
Ron781 Wrote: Jan 03, 2013 12:58 PM
Press control, really? How about some good old fashioned press self control and standards. There is a reason we do not see photographs of the dead, the newspapers do have some standards. Maybe if we saw the photographs this would all have a more lasting effect.
The idea for massacring children in an elementary school or shooting up a mall filled with Christmas shoppers does not come from reading books, watching movies or listening to music. Does the incitement for such unspeakable acts come from hours of role-playing violent video games?

As we speculate on what was going on in the mind of the murderer, the media are trying to blame his evil act on the lack of gun control. But the ownership of firearms or attending a shooting range do not desensitize someone to the cold-blooded murder of many children.

The act of mass, cold-blooded murder...