In response to:

GOP Aims to Ease Bloodshed in 2016 Primary Debates

Harrison Bergeron Wrote: Feb 05, 2013 2:40 PM
Well said. And the only way they're going to get it through their thick skulls is if conservatives stay home (like they did last time) every single time they cram another one of Carl Roves "electable" candidates down our throats. These idiots can't seem to figure out that they couldn't buy the Mexican vote if airdropped green cards on Mexico City. But 50,000,000 conservatives would stand in line for days to vote for another "unelectable" Reagan -- and slam the border shut. Could somebody buy Rove a calculator? And Ann Coulter needs an exorcism!
Conservative abroad Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 12:54 AM
This is exactly why I don't look twice at the Libertarians. I love thier fiscal conservatism but they want to hand out Green Cards just as fast as the Democrats. The end result of that we can see in any South American country. The Libertarians can't seem to realize that the immigrants that they love don't have a Libertarian bone it thier bodies.

"While we were playing footsie debating each other 22 times, they were spending $100 million on technology," Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said last week, referring to his party's rigorous debate schedule in the 2012 GOP presidential primary season. The last campaign, many Republican insiders said during a recent RNC meeting, had too many debates, the result of which was a GOP arguing with itself while Democrats prepared the way for Barack Obama's victory.

There's no doubt the Republican debates produced many damaging moments for the party. There was Mitt Romney's $10,000 bet offer, which helped cement his image as...