In response to:

Attack of the Concern Trolls

harleyone Wrote: Feb 21, 2013 1:50 PM
Oh thank goodness, cause you're not good at it. Libs "need someone to love"? Hmm consider these sterling examples of said "love": *the Left’s well-chronicled obsessive hatred of Sarah Palin, often accompanied by violent rhetoric *his royal highness BHO repeatedly speaks like a Chicago street thug “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” “I want you to go out and talk to your neighbors. . . . I want you to argue with them, get in their faces.”, ‘We’re gonna punish our enemies and we’re gonna reward our friends...", *WaPo's Courtland Milloy "... I want to spit on them, take one of their ‘Obama Plan White Slavery’ signs and knock every racist and homophobic tooth out of their Cro-Magnon heads.”

Turns out the New York Times is worried about the future of the Republican Party. So concerned, in fact, it has dedicated more than 6,000 words in this week’s magazine to explore, as the title puts it, “Can The Republicans Be Saved From Obsolescence?” Indeed, the folks at The Times seem extremely concerned that which they hate might not survive. And by “concerned” I mean they’re hoping.

That The Times would seek to harm Republicans, and more specifically conservatives, is about as shocking as Piers Morgan doing a special episode on the need for gun control. But that so...