In response to:

Jindal: “We Don’t Start Winning Majorities … by Insulting Our Voters.”

Hardrock Lausanne Wrote: Nov 18, 2012 2:17 PM
Obama promises what his constituency wants from him. It's how elections work. The public has a list of goals and needs that must be met, and a representative is chosen to deliver them. It's called a functioning society. Granted there will be those who do not have the same list of needs. But it comes down to the desires of the many at the expense of the desires of the view. #democraticprocess
Lance8762 Wrote: Nov 18, 2012 2:21 PM
Maobama and the Democrat party of today depend on a coalition of special interests, moochers, and deviates. With the decay of our culture and our nation, they gain numbers with every election.
Hardrock Lausanne Wrote: Nov 18, 2012 2:24 PM
You still haven't addressed the parallels between dems' requests from those that represent them and conservatives' requests of those who represent them.
ReddestNeck Wrote: Nov 18, 2012 2:33 PM
We knuckle draggin' red neck troglodytes don't think the two modes of operating government are morally equivalent.
Lance8762 Wrote: Nov 18, 2012 2:34 PM
Parallels? If you cannot ascertain the differences between the constituents on the opposing sides, sense the building chaos in our society, and smell the stench of evil on the left, no explaination will help you understand.

You are either plain ignorant, blind, or should be watered twice a week.
Hardrock Lausanne Wrote: Nov 18, 2012 2:40 PM
Lance, I think you misunderstood my point.
Hardrock Lausanne Wrote: Nov 18, 2012 2:18 PM
Besides, this bagging on Obama about this (no matter how ill-informed it is) implies that conservatives wanted nothing from Romney - of course they did, that's why he ran for office, to deliver promises. Boom.
ReddestNeck Wrote: Nov 18, 2012 2:27 PM
Mitt's promises were more realistic and sustainable than Obama's.
Hardrock Lausanne Wrote: Nov 18, 2012 2:34 PM
Yes, Reddneck, and what did he promise?
ReddestNeck Wrote: Nov 18, 2012 2:38 PM
To help the job creators do what they do best. Of course this might be lost on the dedicated moocher crowd, granted.
Hardrock Lausanne Wrote: Nov 18, 2012 2:48 PM
That's it? His whole campaign was about helping "job creators"? No wonder he lost. Can you get any more vague?
ReddestNeck Wrote: Nov 18, 2012 3:08 PM
What's vague about it. It points up the asininity of class war on "the rich." The poor don't create jobs. The poor don't even pay a lot of taxes, if any.

On Fox News Sunday Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal once again distanced himself from Mitt Romney’s unfortunate and divisive post-election remarks, and upbraided two Republican Senate candidates for “saying stupid things” during the 2012 election cycle:

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal continued his critique of the Republican Party and its 2012 presidential contender Mitt Romney on Sunday as he argued for the GOP to become a larger tent party.

Romney drew a firestorm of backlash from fellow Republicans when he told donors on a conference call that President Barack Obama defeated him because of so-called “gifts” that he gave to...