So taxes will be going up. As a matter of political strategy -- not to say survival -- Republicans will have to agree to raise taxes on those defined as rich. It's...
What I love is the arbitrary definition of "rich." That $250,000 figure is something someone pulled out of a hat. And before you start yammering on about "that represents the top one percent" or whatever it actually represents (the actual pecentage is inconsequential), what that number's actually saying is that someone who earns $249,999.99 a year is NOT "rich." "The Rich" is an arbitrary term that basically means "anyone who makes more than you do." So raising taxes on "the Rich" sounds fine to people too lazy to understand what it means. Here's the problem, though. If you raise taxes on "the Rich" too much, they aren't "rich" anymore. When the need for revenues goes up again, who gets to pay the bill?
Realistic Republicans understand that President Obama and the Democrats head into fiscal cliff negotiations in a far stronger bargaining position now than in 2011. When voters were asked on Nov. 6 whether they favored raising taxes to reduce the deficit, a total of 60 percent said yes (47 percent favored increasing taxes for those who earn $250,000 or more, and 13 percent approved tax increases for all).
- Why won’t the White House explain how off-budget ObamaCare money got spent? Ed Morrissey 54 minutes ago
- Are bans on high capacity magazines constitutional? Jazz Shaw 2 hours ago
- Quotes of the day Allahpundit 13 hours ago
- EPA exonerates Christie administration in obscure bridge-related offense someone made up Mary Katharine Ham 14 hours ago
- California energy companies are getting the heck outta’ dodge and moving to Texas Erika Johnsen 15 hours ago
- CNN poll: 58% oppose abortion in most or all cases Ed Morrissey 16 hours ago