In response to:

Indiana Senate: Mourdock Under Fire for Abortion Comments

Happy Jake Wrote: Oct 25, 2012 6:03 AM
... think rape victims have asked for it. In my experience it is always progressives - men and women - who blame the victim of a horrible crime, like, say, Whoopi "It wasn't rape-rape" Goldberg. Come to think of it, you on the Left blame the child for the rape more than you do the rapist. After all, you believe absolutely that the child should be executed and the rapist should go free once he's "rehabilitated." Shame.

The tight Indiana Senate race has taken a controversial turn in the last twenty-four hours, as Republican hopeful Richard Mourdock deals with fallout from his remarks about abortion in last night’s debate. It’s the same concept that got Todd Akin in trouble: the candidate’s stance on abortion in the case of rape or incest. Pro-life Mourdock does not support an exception in either case, and his word choice in so stating has him in hot water with Democrats and even some fellows on the Right.

Unlike Akin, however, Mourdock didn’t make an offensive or outrageous claim based on junk...