In response to:

Hispanicked GOP Elite: They'll Respect Us In the Morning

Happy Jake Wrote: Feb 21, 2013 7:32 AM
The proposals being bandied about all hinge on allowing people who've broken our laws to come here not only to stay here indefinitely, but to be given eventual citizenship. What part of that doesn't fall under the definition of "amnesty?" And if not "amnesty," what's the better word or phrase? "Incentives to break the law?" "Disincentives to follow the law?"
Don't anyone tell Marco Rubio, John McCain or Jeff Flake that nearly 80 percent of Hindus voted for Obama, or who knows what they'll come up with.

I understand the interest of business lobbies in getting cheap, unskilled labor through amnesty, but why do Republican officeholders want to create up to 20 million more Democratic voters, especially if it involves flouting the law? Are the campaign donations from the soulless rich more important than actual voters?

Without citing any evidence, the Rubio Republicans simply assert that granting 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens amnesty will make Hispanics warm...