In response to:

Gun Nuts vs. Anti-Gun Nuts II

haluya Wrote: Apr 01, 2013 10:32 AM
Instead of writing an article acknowledging mistakes, a real reporter/journalist would have done a minimum of research. But liberal zealots are do not operate from facts and reason; they play on people's emotions. Probably the vast majority of those in the liberal media preaching gun control, as with this author, have no idea....NONE....what gun ownership involves, what it means, how the Second Amendment came about and how asinine "gun control" legislation truly is. People like Bloomingidiot, Cuomo, Diane FrankenFeinstein, Biden and all the rest are obsessed with gun confiscation for completely irrational reasons. They are anti-Constitutionalists. UnAmerican by definition. See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5ELyG9V1SY
CommonSense4America Wrote: Apr 01, 2013 4:46 PM
I have already thanked Mr. Bialosky for correcting his mistake. Unlike the MSM, he admitted his mistake. Now if only 52% of america would admit their mistake known as Obama.
Chris from Kalifornia Wrote: Apr 01, 2013 10:35 AM
Don't downplay the admitting of a mistake. That's necessary for the proper establishment of fact. It highlights the basic honor of the writer. Would you trust the word of someone who NEVER admits to being wrong? Like Obama?

A few weeks back we wrote a column about the issues being debated regarding potentially restricting the rights of gun owners established by the second amendment. The column was generally well received, but there was one point of contention that remains the center of debate regarding gun owners’ rights -- especially with the flaming out of Senator Feinstein’s bill on what she refers to as “assault weapons.” We need to correct this point and we discuss the issue in greater depth.

We stated that, as someone not clearly on either the side of Gun Nuts or the Anti-Gun Nuts, we...