1 - 10 Next
In response to:

How the Apostates Take Over, Part 1

halleysfifth Wrote: Mar 18, 2012 10:28 AM
The verifiable proof is not so elusive as you might think. You might start with ' love' . It is incompatible with the laws of nature in that is opposes the necessary element of survival of the fittest, in its selflessness. It transcends the natural instinct of animals to protect their young because sacrifice is not instinctive. It is not possible to reason the evolution of love. Does love end with death?
In response to:

Apologize Like You Mean It, Rush

halleysfifth Wrote: Mar 08, 2012 7:48 AM
That a woman would/could publicly defend the type of behavior that was the universally accepted definition of a sl*t up until a few years ago suggests that that word does not mean what it used to mean. Apparently it now means "conservative female". No wonder the left was so out-raged. Cheers to Rush for calling sin sin.
Our county school system spends more per child than our local parochial school. I have no numbers to corroborate the statistics in the column, but having had children in both systems it is clearly obvious that educating the students is taken far more seriously in the Catholic school by both the faculty and the parents - an attitude that filters down to the kids, elevating their own aspirations for themselves. I was particularly struck by the low expectations the public schools seem to have for their students.
Technically, capitalism is the absence of distribution.
In response to:

Obama vs. Catholics

halleysfifth Wrote: Jan 25, 2012 8:07 AM
The Catholic Church is a standard against which society often measures it's values. Notre Dame compromised that standard, validating the liberal bias of the media.
In response to:

Obama vs. Catholics

halleysfifth Wrote: Jan 25, 2012 8:03 AM
History is full of empires that brought about their own demise. God may be on our side, but are we on His?
In response to:

Republican Voters' Choices

halleysfifth Wrote: Dec 29, 2011 9:02 AM
With all due respect for the highly esteemed Mr. Sowell - if Obama's bomb-planting friends and other questionable associations didn't prevent his election the first time - it won't make any difference in 2012. The people who elected him don't watch FOX news or subscribe to Townhall, and the msm would rather dwell on more important issues - like the expense of Bachmann's wardrobe and Romney's faith.
So - it's only true if the mainstream media reports it? Why do you think the FOX news channel exists - and is the highest rated news channel?
In response to:

Gullible Americans

halleysfifth Wrote: Dec 28, 2011 7:31 AM
That rationale could be used to regulate anything you do or say by virtue of it's being a nuisance to someone else. Once government is given the authority to impose itself on an individual's life, there are no limits to it's control - and you are too gullible to see it. DHE - Williams is talking about YOU!
Much can be derived by consideration of the company one keeps. This postulate by which parents monitor their children's friends is no less pertinent to the president of the United States. A man as "smart" as he is cannot possibly be unaware of the nature of the modus operandi of his political associates - if not intricately involved, himself.
1 - 10 Next
Tuesday, June 05 | 01:07 AM ET
Tuesday, June 05 | 01:07 AM ET
Tuesday, June 05 | 01:07 AM ET
Tuesday, June 05 | 01:07 AM ET