In response to:

The Need for Semi-Automatic "Assault" Weapons

hagar2 Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 9:59 AM
First I dont NEED any weapons but I have an obligation to defend my family and my country against all criminals regardless if they sneak in the night or are elected ones. As to any laws they pass they are invalid and I dont need hand picked sycophants in congress or SCOTUS to tell me different the founders where quite clear on the subject: “Every law consistent with the Constitution will have been made in pursuance of the powers granted by it. Every usurpation or law repugnant to it cannot have been made in pursuance of its powers. The latter will be nugatory and void.” Thomas Jefferson The strongest reason for the people to retain their right to keep and bear arms is as a last resort to protect themselves against tyranny in government." -

By now, we’ve heard the argument about semi-automatic "assault" rifles: nobody needs one. We’ve heard the only reason why someone would obtain this kind of weapon is so they can kill people, which is far from the truth. We’ve also heard the argument from both the Left and the Right that a pistol is how someone protects their home.

"I really don’t know why people need assault weapons. I’m not a hunter but I understand people who want to hunt," Republican Rep. Peter King said on Morning Joe earlier this week. "I understand people who live in rough neighborhoods...

Thursday, May 23 | 07:06 AM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 07:06 AM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 07:06 AM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 07:06 AM ET