So you like the defendent clearly miss the point! The loser receives gov't handouts for college & gov't handouts for rent. He lies by accepting the rent money & not using it for rent. He found another loser who does not pay rent.. & this loser is going to college, I think this says alot about the education system, it is not just the public k-12 system, but "higher" education too. Horrifying! So commchf, this does actually apply to townhall. The welfare system abuse (which this loser is on welfare, since he does not work and receives gov't hand outs).. and it is an example of the horrible poor excuse for an education system! Both of these are things that the gov't wants to expand, the the Democrats defend these (abused) programs!

... left blank too, like defense, immigration, and then areas he is for like unions is an area that concerns me. all the points seem to source 2009 but it is worth examining further.. any candidate is, and sure was the big problem with people who voted for obama they did not even bother to open their eyes since so many issues with him were laying right out in plain view. so i am not fond of christie, adding when i look at so much about new jersey, it makes me wince.. extremely high taxes, absolute gun control, emininet domain issues (trumps form trampling ground).. these are some of the things that concern me. and a republican candidate or politician on either coast is often more of a democrat in disguise.

Diane, I grew up in MD my husband in NJ, and we both lived in DE.. we still have friends & family back in NJ, DE & MD.. but we escaped the liberal nuttery that is coast. I like Parker's comment that we should not let the media pick another candidate, and the point about this being an AP article definitely makes it something to set of alarms.. if the AP is basiclly backing a candidate, even if you think you know that candidate.. look deeper. Everytime I hear/see Christie I have had alarm bells, and I had those for Obama & Carter too.. so it is something that more fact need to be examined on him. for light reading this site does show where he stands on many political areas http://www.ontheissues.org/Chris_Christie.htm but alot is ...

PS I want to add.. why does any group that feels oppressed go completely militant? they go nuts.. due to race, sex, orientation, religion.. do they not see they could/would be see they could be taken seriously if they did not go completely nuts? Ps.. I am a woman, and grew up fully exposed and fell into the women's lib movement.. so i know how easy it is to get taken in by that garbage.. but it never needed to be.. It all needs to stop!

This is the problem, and it is sad. While I never have had issues with gay people, it is the nut jobs who are pulling a homo-card to protect themselves for actions that no straight-conservative would ever even think about getting away with. The operative word.."think".. i wonder if those gay-activists are thinking? I know not all gay people are like this, just like the disgusting displays of gay-pride parades do not represent all gay people, it gives a horrible & negative impression about gay people.. gay people should not be fighting conservatives, they need to fight against their very own bad press, their own high-profile, highly exposed (in many ways), horrible examples... it simply does not have to be that way.

I am not an Obama fan, in any way shape or form.. but seriously his error on his daughters birthday by a matter of days is pretty sad.. there is more than enough to find issue with Obama. Heck my parents were off on my age by years, they also thought I had blond curly hair & brown eyes (I have poker straight brunette hair & green eyes).. sooo this is one that is just ridiculous..

For those who did not have the (nausea) "joy" of viewing these clueless college students professing their political party pride.. here ya go;.. http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xjkfnu_priceless-college-democrats-of-america-why-i-m-a-democrat_news

gotta love the back-handed "defense" there.. she did not need to start with "she would never get my vote".. but the fact she could rise to defending her we can offer have a kudo & some hope liberals are human-ish too!

I did not read through the comments but after seeing the youtube had been yanked, I saw the Update 2.. and the vimeo too had been yanked : "Sorry, "Why I'm a Democrat" was deleted at 11:37:32 Mon Jun 27, 2011. We have no more information about it on our mainframe or elsewhere. " This does confirm many media sources having serious liberal bias.. and are out in force censoring anything that offends them.. you know the truth. Good Grief!

This was a terribly wishy-washy article.

I also am bewildered by the positive comment on what Obama has done.. stating Obama transforming the polarization in Washington & improving American's tarnished international image...
REALLY?

He has made things more divisive then any other President has come close to.. heck even Carter!
And when it comes to the international image, he has insulted our allies and apologized to our enemies. How on earth is that improving America's image? I see it as far more damaging to America's image then our country has ever had.

Yes, politics/politicians in general are not terribly different, not terribly trusted.. but it is a matter of the lesser of evils.. until we can figure a...