Homosexual activists achieved historic gains in the November 2012 election in the states of Washington, Maine and Maryland. These three notoriously liberal states passed laws extending marriage benefits to homosexual relationships by four to six percentage points. But will these legal victories ultimately deny them the sweeping Supreme Court decision they long for?
Judge Robert Jones of a federal court in Nevada has laid the groundwork for such a conclusion. In his ruling on a lawsuit which sought to overturn Nevada’s ban on gay marriage, Jones wrote that the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) lobby’s success in advancing its...











If you wouldnt' accept 'nearly', then why should anyone else?
Equal treatment under the law, means equal treatment under the law. Gay people are compelled to be equally law abiding, equally responsible and even more when it comes to being tax payers. Equally required to work and contribute to the general welfare. Nearly the same rights, wouldn't be fair for being FULLY responsible. THAT is the truth of the matter. Just because you can't handle that truth, doesn't mean gay citizens should suffer for it.
Especially when you call such unprovoked, insane viciousness against them 'disagreement'?
Hypocrisy is vicious and teaches nothing but dishonesty and wrongfulness. It's wrong to get fat, and starve someone for something that literally is unlimited bounty for everyone. Sharing marriage with gay people, doesn't hurt anyone at all.