In response to:

Shocker: Democrats Reject Yet Another 'Cliff' Plan They Once Supported

Guy Benson Wrote: Dec 19, 2012 10:59 AM
Then what *should* Republicans vote for? I agree that this is all pathetically dysfunctional, but you've basically just threatened to primary any GOP member who does...anything.
Dan_NV Wrote: Dec 19, 2012 11:08 AM
There are several options that have been put forward that address this issue in a much more responsible way and show actual leadership from the Republicans rather than the typical milquetoast response. You insult me with your quip about "threatening" anyone who does anything, I think my point was clear and is consistent with many conservatives on this issue. For starters, read Hewitt's article and get a clue.
Marc_H Wrote: Dec 19, 2012 11:05 AM
it that concept too hard to understand

This could make for one hell of a drinking game.  Step one: Republicans propose an idea that high-ranking Democrats have explicitly supported in the very recent past.  Step two: Democrats unceremoniously dump all over the idea, calling it "unacceptable," "dead on arrival," or whatever the dismissive pejorative of the day may be.  Step three: Drink (and I've got just the beverage in mind for this occasion).  The trouble is that by this stage in our interminable cliff charade, everyone involved would be too wasted to negotiate any further -- which actually might not be the worst thing in...