In response to:

Arguing with Liberals: Our Massive Deficit "Isn't a Product of Spending"

Guy Benson Wrote: Jan 16, 2013 3:03 PM
There is, in fact, a liberal who won't acknowledge that the deficit is a direct result of spending: The guy in this video. It's exhausting to correct your side's dishonesty. Let me ask you two questions: When was the last time Bush and the Republicans controlled the entire budget process (the wars, tax cuts, Medicare Part D, etc. all included)? What was the budget deficit for that year? Here are the answers: FY 2007, and $161 billion. That's still too high, and Republicans were not as fiscally responsible as they should have been, but it simply does not compare to the avalanche that Pelosi/Reid/Obama have engineered. But thanks for playing. Sincerely, Dumbo
JulieBrown Wrote: Jan 16, 2013 3:16 PM
Guy, You can explain FACTS over and over to liberals and they will NEVER understand a word of it.
FranksNBeans Wrote: Jan 16, 2013 3:13 PM
Guy, there is no sake in arguing with liberals sometimes. The have been of a single mindset for a decade now. It always comes back to "it's because of Bush".

Even when Obama presents the same policy that Bush was criticized for, there is always an excuse to justify Obama doing.

On CNBC last night, I participated in a discussion about America's debt and debt ceiling problems -- which are inextricably linked, despite the Left's bizarre insistence that they're two separate and distinct issues.  I made the overtly partisan statement that Republicans are the only political actors in Washington who are even remotely serious about dealing with the debt crisis -- and the Democrat on the panel seemed determined to prove me right.  Most of the fireworks came toward the end of the exchange, when Democratic strategist Mark Hannah decided to go the full hack. He began by attacking House Republicans...