1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Voter Fraud and Voter I.D.

Guy56 Wrote: Nov 05, 2014 11:02 AM
"If we are going to talk about history, let's at least get the facts right". As if the Hon Charles Rangel who I am sure does know the facts, cares in the least. Good one Dr. Sowell. Funny.
I wasn't going to comment on this article but your note has motivated me. I tend to agree with the few other commentators that Mr. Bush cannot motivate the conservative core. I like the Bushes but they believe in big government and I do not. It might be time for a third party. What I like about your note is that you manage to combine a straw man and an ad hominem argument in a single statement. Two illogical assertions without ever commenting upon the actual content of the article.
In response to:

After the Wave Comes the Liberation

Guy56 Wrote: Oct 30, 2014 9:39 PM
If only politicians were saying this. Republicans may win but liberation? Somehow I doubt it.
In response to:

Kansas Senate Race is a National Election

Guy56 Wrote: Oct 20, 2014 9:53 AM
"But at least there is hope that the Republican Party can get back on track." And this hope is based on what exactly? And if we say hope does not require evidence then why none for the Democrats. I like your columns Ms. Parker but as an independent I am not on board the Republican bandwagon here on Townhall. They have had plenty of opportunity to be a conservative voice and they have refused to do so.
In response to:

Don't 'Vote for the Candidate'

Guy56 Wrote: Oct 14, 2014 9:27 AM
Where is the evidence that a republican Senate will block liberal Judges? I don't see it. I have been hearing this line for 40 years. The Republicans could not keep the sequester. Townhall has a lot of Republican columnists. They should talk more to the Republican candidates. Not with them on this one.
A big part of your argument here is ad hominem. I would also note that if the "hard libertarians" were never GOP supporters then why would they somehow become supporters in order to support a less than ideal candidate? As both a value's conservative and a hard libertarian I no longer see Republican's as conservative. -They couldn't even keep the sequester- I am not susceptible to the idea that things would be better if Republican's are in power. The Republicans brought down a party. Perhaps it is time for them to come down.
While I tend to agree with your argument about two party systems it is the case that the two parties can change. Obviously the Republican party is the example of that. I believe that the conservative argument is not being made. Neither is it being explicated by the Republicans nor is it winning the day. And most Republicans are simply not conservative so none of the benefits being espoused will actually occur. Regarding the Senate as a bulwark against judges I suggest taking a look at the nominees for Supreme Court justice who have already been confirmed by Republican Senates. That is purely a talking point. With only a few exceptions they cave. Sadly, I agree with point 4). I just think the Republicans need to become conservative as the needed point of consensus. Otherwise we will simply have Republican masters instead of Democratic masters.
I am with you Mr. Sorrentino. I am often a fan of Ms. Coulter's directness, but she has more faith in the Republican party than I do. For myself I am a cultural conservative and a libertarian, and a registered independent. I don't see the point of voting for Republicans just because they are not Democrats. You said it better I am not in favor of big government neo-cons because they have an R next to their name. In the end of course the problem is the electorate. We keep buying the idea that the other guy's welfare is a problem but we earned what we are getting. Great article, but sad.
Terrific compilation. Might there be some sources for these quotes available?
In response to:

Why Exposes of the Clintons Fail

Guy56 Wrote: Jul 31, 2014 1:10 PM
Just you. I like Latin quotes. Gives me something to learn.
1 - 10 Next